|
Clinical
Pharmacology
"Adverse Drug
Event of the month"
| Month : |
June |
| Year : |
2005 |
|
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Pediatrics* |
Kulkarni
GS, Patekar MN, Gogtay NJ, Deshmukh CT*, Kshirsagar NA. |
Probable Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus
(DPT) vaccine induced encephalopathy and death
Case report:
A 3-month-old male child weighing 3.7 Kg presented to the emergency
unit of this hospital with decreased activity and labored breathing
since the morning of 1/05/05. He had received first dose of DPT vaccination
24 hrs back. Within 5 hrs of receiving the dose he developed fever,
excessive crying and reduced spontaneous activity. He was seen in a
private clinic and at our hospital and was noted to have no significant
abnormality. Patient was sent home with an advice to take syrup Ibuprofen.
After that the patient was asymptomatic, his previous complaints subsided
and he was taking feeds normally during the intervening period the patient
till next day morning when he developed labored breathing. On admission
to the hospital, his heart rate was 140/min, blood pressure 76/50mmHg
and was afebrile with good perfusion. On central nervous system examination
his sensorium was E4 M4 VE1 according to Glasgow coma scale, his pupils
were bilaterally equal in size and were sluggishly reacting to light.
Superficial reflexes and deep reflexes were normal and there were no
signs of meningeal or cerebellar involvement. Other systemic examination
revealed normal findings. He was intubated immediately and was given
intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and external cardiac
message. There was a history of generalized tonic clonic convulsions
with up rolling of eyeballs without frothing at mouth after admission
lasting for 10 seconds.
Laboratory investigations done on the day of admission revealed a hemoglobin
concentration of 7.8gm% and total leukocyte count of 45,800/mm3. Serum
concentrations of sodium and potassium were 136 and 6.6mEq/L respectively.
The peripheral smear did not demonstrate any malaria parasites.
He was treated with intravenous antibiotics, intravenous Phenobarbitone,
Vitamin D and intravenous Calcium Gluconate. On follow up, he was weaned
off the ventilator and extubated on 10/05/05 His laboratory investigations
at day 11 were hemoglobin of 11.6 gm%, total leukocyte count of 18,800/mm3
platelet concentration 80,800. Serum concentrations of sodium and potassium
were 138 and 4 mEq/L respectively. Arterial blood gas concentrations
were in normal range, Blood urea Nitrogen was 15mg%. On 25/5/05 patient's
condition deteriorated suddenly and he died of respiratory failure.
The parents of the child did not permit a post mortem.
Just before death, his laboratory investigations revealed hemoglobin
concentration of 9.8%, leukocyte count 7900/mm3 platelets were adequate.
Serum concentrations of sodium and potassium were 128 and 4.8 m Eq/L
respectively and blood urea nitrogen was 9mg%.
Arterial blood gas concentrations revealed pH 7.4, PCo2- 21.6, Po2 -16.3,
HCo3 28.7, RBS 99 mg%.
Discussion:
Using the Naranjo's Adverse Drug
Reactions (ADR) probability scale we made a causality assessment, which
categorized this reaction as possible (Score 3). The Naranjo's algorithm
categorizes adverse reactions as definite (score > 9), probable (score
between 5- and 8), possible (score 1-4) and doubtful (score < 1) (Naranjo
et.al, 1981) The DPT vaccine consists of diphtheria, tetanus toxoid
and Pertussis vaccine consisting of killed organisms. As the pertussis
component consists of whole cell killed organisms, the pertussis vaccine
is also known as whole cell vaccine and designated as wP. It is a combination
vaccine and a
single injection provides immunity against three important killer diseases
namely, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus. In addition, the pertussis
component in DPT vaccine enhances the potency of the diphtheria toxoid.
The composition of the vaccine is shown in Table 1.The vaccine is highly
immunogenic and offers significant long-term protection. Two types of
DPT vaccines are available: plain and adsorbed. Adsorption is usually
carried out on a mineral carrier like aluminum phosphate or hydroxide.
Studies have shown that adsorption increases the immunological effectiveness
of the vaccine (Park K, 2002). Recently newer Acellular Pertussis vaccine
is also available for use in India.
Status of Acellular Vaccine in India:
The Indian Academy Of Pediatrics Committee on Immunization (IAPCOI)
endorses the continued use of whole cell pertussis vaccine (as DPT)
because of its proven efficacy and safety. Acellular pertussis vaccines
may undoubtedly have fewer side-effects (like fever, local reactions
at injection site and irritability), but this minor advantage does not
offset the inordinate costs involved in the routine use of this vaccine.
Acellular pertussis vaccines are also, by no means, more effective than
the whole cell pertussis vaccine. These are, therefore, not recommended
for universal immunization in our country at present. There is, however,
no bar to offering these vaccines to children from well-off families
who opt for the prohibitive costs for the slight advantage of fewer
minor side-effects (5). Use of acellular
pertussis vaccine should, however, be considered in children who have
had significant reactions to a previous dose of whole cell pertussis
vaccine. These include:
(i) convulsions with/without fever occurring within 3 days.
(ii) persistent inconsolable crying for 3 or more hours within 48 hours.
(iii) collapse or shock-like state within 48 hours.
(iv) temperature >40.5 ēC within 48 hours.
Table1 COMPOSITION
OF DPT VACCINE
(Khubchandani R.P.,1999) |
| Vaccine |
Contents |
Administration |
Protective
efficacy |
Contraindication |
Side effects
|
Complications |
|
DPT
|
Each 0.5ml
contains: Diphtheria toxoid; 25L.f, Tetanus toxoid; 5L.f Pertussis;
4IU (20,000 million Killed bacteria) |
0.5ml deep
IM anterioateral aspect of thigh |
Diphtheria
and Tetanus: almost 100% Pertussis: 80% |
Progressive
neurological disease, uncontrolled convulsions, severe reactions
to first or subsequent dose |
Fever, local
pain |
Convulsion,
screaming episodes, shock, encephalitis |
.
(Lf: Loeffler units)
It has been shown that young infants respond well to immunization with
potent vaccine and toxoids even in the presence of low to moderate levels
of maternal antibodies. Hence, primary immunization is commenced at 6
weeks of age and 3 doses are given at an interval of 4 weeks. Booster
vaccination of DPT is administered at 18 months of age. The second booster
vaccination is given at 5 years of age. However, at this age only DT (Diphtheria
and Tetanus), toxoid is used and pertussis component is not provided.
This is done in the belief, that at age greater than 5 years pertussis
infection does not pose a great threat to life but risk of serious complications
associated with pertussis component is disproportionately higher.
The administration of any dose is contra-indicated in the presence of
severe illness requiring hospitalization, shock-like state, uncontrolled
seizure disorder, excessive crying with fever > 3 hours and progressive
neurological disease. Presence of minor illness such as mild fever, cough
and loose motions do not contra-indicate administration of a DPT dose
[2]. The vaccine is administered deep
intra-muscularly as it contains mineral carrier or adjuvants. Fever and
mild local reactions are the common side effects that follow immunization.
Probable Mechanism of DPT vaccine induced neurological damage:
In implicating pertussis vaccination in the evolution of subsequent neurological
residua, a careful consideration of the mechanism for vaccine-induced
brain damage plays an important supporting role. Pertussis toxin has been
shown to alter cellular signaling. It also affects the catecholaminergic
and GABAergic systems in the brain. In addition, a direct, endotoxin-mediated
attack on the endothelial cells could create a local defect of the blood-brain
barrier. It is being seen that a combination of one or more bacterial
toxins, asphyxia, Co2 retention and loss of cerebral autoregulation is
responsible for neurological symptoms.
Encephalopathy manifests with alteration of sensorium or generalized or
focal seizures that persist for more than a few hours. Occurrence of hypotensive-hyporesponsive
shock or post-vaccination encephalopathy is a contra-indication of further
doses of the pertussis component. This should be explained to the guardians.
Other manifestations that indicate occurrence of encephalopathy include:
seizures with or without fever occurring within 3 days of immunization
and persistent, severe, inconsolable screaming or crying for 3 or more
hours within 48 hours of immunization. Usually, these are not associated
with permanent sequel. Previously, occurrence of these events also meant
withdrawal of pertussis component from doses to be received in future.
However, it is now recommended that all factors should be considered while
advising regarding DPT vaccination in future in these children.
Association of severe reactions made the whole- cell pertussis vaccine
highly unpopular among many communities and countries and spurred research
for safer vaccines. Some European countries even went to the extent of
withdrawing (whole-cell) pertussis vaccination; only to find an increased
incidence of and increased morbidity due to pertussis amongst infants
and young children in the community. An acellular pertussis vaccine (Designated
as aP) is now available in several countries including India. It contains
purified, inactivated components of B. pertussis. The acellular vaccine
is as potent as the whole cell vaccine, but it is still associated with
neurological complications described with whole-cell vaccine, albeit at
a much lower frequency. It is also credited with lesser incidence of local
side effects as well as decreased incidence of severe reactions like seizures
and hypotensive episodes. However, the vaccine is expensive and it is
unlikely that it would be included in the Indian National immunization
schedule in near future.
Errors which can lead to Adverse events following immunization
- Too much vaccine given in one dose ˇ Improper immunization site
or route
- Syringes and needles improperly sterilized
- Vaccine reconstituted with incorrect diluents
- Wrong amount of diluents used
- Drug inadvertently substituted for vaccine or diluent
- Vaccine prepared incorrectly for the use, e.g. an adsorbed vaccine
not been shaken properly before use
- Vaccine or diluent contaminated
- Vaccine stored incorrectly
- Vaccines are not standardized between manufacturers.
- Contraindications ignored, e.g. a child who experienced a severe
reaction after a previous dose of DTP is immunized with the same vaccine
Inattention when reading labels on vials resulting in mistaken content.
- Reconstituted vaccine not thrown out at the end of an immunization
session and used at a subsequent one.
Discussion on risk benefit for Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus (DPT)
Vaccination
On the basis of a review of the current state of knowledge on whooping
cough, the vaccine, and vaccine safety, it has been concluded that the
dangers of the disease outweigh any known hazards of the vaccine. Although
whooping cough is less important a cause of death and disability at present,
it remains a potentially lethal disease that should be controlled. The
safety of the vaccine is an especially critical question, however, since
it is being advocated for use on a mass scale in previously healthy children.
The results of studies such as the National Childhood Encephalopathy Study
suggest DPT vaccination is associated with a greater frequency of acute
neurological illnesses than would be expected by chance. On the other
hand, most cases of such complications were not time-associated with DPT
vaccination and may have resulted from the less purified vaccines used
in the past. The most critical element in decision making is the readiness
of parents and doctors to accept the fact that active preventive measures
such as pertussis immunization sometimes carry unavoidable risks that
have to be weighed against the risk of nonintervention(7).
References:
1. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I,
Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse
drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;30:239-45.
2. Khubchandani RP. Immunization. In: Saini GS editor.
API text book of medicine 6th ed. 1999. Mumbai, p.1136.
3. Park K. Epidemiology of Communicable diseases. In:
Preventive and Social Medicine, 17th edition. 2002. India. p.126.
4. Committee on Immunization, Indian Academy of Pediatrics.
IAP Guidebook on Immunization second edition. Mumbai, Indian Academy of
Pediatrics, 2001. p. 47.
5. Update on immunization policies, guidelines and recommendations
Indian Pediatrics 2004;41-239-44.
6. Galazka A M, Lauer B A, Henderson R H, Keja J 1984
Indications and contraindications for vaccines used in the Expanded Programme
on Immunization. Builletin of the World Health Organization 62:357-66.
7. Miller DL, Alderslade R, Ross EM. Whooping cough and
whooping cough vaccine: the risks and benefits debate. Epidemiol Rev 1982;4:1-24.
Dept. of Clinical Pharmacology,
1st Floor, MS Building,
Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital,
Parel, Mumbai. 400012.
Ph. 91-22-24174420, 91-22-24133767
Fax 91-22-24143435
dcpkem@vsnl.com
|